A Love Story About Divorce: Comparing Ticket to Paradise (2022) to Marriage Story (2019)

First Published via HUB Magazine when I was Culture Editor.

Date Published: 14th October 2022.

As soon as I saw the trailer, I knew it was going to be corny, but as Kate Winslet says in The Holiday (Nancy Meyers, 2006), “I like corny, I’m looking for corny in my life”. Ticket to Paradise (Ol Parker, 2022) is unapologetically corny. While it is easy to dismiss a corny film, I found that this film moved me deeply. 

This film follows the bickering divorced couple (played by Julia Roberts and George Clooney), who come together to stop their daughter’s wedding. While they continue to argue throughout the film, their love for each other is increasingly apparent to the audience. Ticket to Paradise plays with the fine line between love and hate, juxtaposing their displays of love in private settings with competitive hatred when in public. 

It’s interesting to see Lucas Bravo play a comedic role rather than the swoony romantic role he played in Emily in Paris. While here he was merely a side character playing Roberts’ rebound boyfriend, he still managed to bring life and humour to the performance. I was also pleasantly surprised by Kaitlyn Dever and Maxime Bouttier, as this was the first film of theirs that I have seen and do not disappoint. 

The film is set in Bali, making the cinematography breathtaking in every scene. However, those are not the shots that stood out to me. Instead, it was the lonely bar scene. Clooney sits at a bar with a neon bar backdrop, with only him and one bartender there. At this moment where the audience truly sees how lonely Clooney is. 

Whereas Roberts is peacefully asleep, Clooney is awake and frequenting a bar – having just realised that his ex-wife has finally moved on. When his daughter’s best friend approaches him, he describes how his marriage ended. The director portrays this change of emotion from the cold, lonely wide shot to a brighter shot featuring more close-ups. Clooney brilliantly conveys all the emotions of a divorce. This was the first time that I wept. This scene reminded me of the ending of Marriage Story (Noah Baumbach, 2019). There is something truly moving about seeing two divorced people with love still in their hearts. 

Ticket to Paradise is a story about falling back in love. The film begins with the characters discussing their divorce, with side characters asking about their divorce and current relationship. This film asks why the good stuff should be left for later when you could do it now instead. This is incredibly different from the real world, where two people would have to discuss what getting back together would entail. 

This film maintains a similar concept to the one shown in Marriage Story. In the beginning, Scarlet Johansson and Adam Driver read out letters to the audience that they refuse read to each other, whether out of embarrassment or pride is unclear and frankly unimportant. This allows the audience to understand the full picture of their relationship and grow close to the couple themselves. Towards the film’s closing, Driver finds their son reading Johansson’s letter and even begins to cry when he reads that she still loves him. This full-circle moment allows Johansson and Driver to become civil and loving parents even if they are not together anymore.  

Both films have the reoccurring blue imagery, whether that’s the blue sea in Ticket to Paradise and his blue shirt or the blue walls and Driver’s blue shirt in the letter scene of Marriage Story. This blue could represent the calm that comes with finally having closure, whether that is restarting their relationship, such as in the former or remaining civil such as in the latter film. 

The mother’s feelings are equally important in both films, with both films reflecting on how the mothers feel as if they have lost themselves to motherhood. Johansson’s character emphasises that she feels lost in Driver’s life, reduced to simply a wife and mother rather than a person. Roberts leaves Clooney, also fearing the loss of individuality that comes with being a wife and mother. 

This concept has begun to be touched more in films, with one of the most obvious being Lili Reinhart’s performance in Look Both Ways (Wanuri Kahiu, 2022). These characters have felt so absorbed by motherhood that they are no longer a person, only a mother. While that sentiment is strongly felt, it is essential to note this does not define their love for their children. The love for their child that brings Clooney and Roberts back together. Ticket to Paradise emphasises the importance of communication in a marriage. Both parents were struggling with parenthood and having a partner. Neither wanted to stress their partner, leading both to crumble and break. This is reflected in the symbolism of the dream house burning, which they believed to show the lack of love in their marriage instead playing the part of the stress they both felt. 

I believe that Ticket to Paradise, through the electric chemistry between Roberts and Clooney, the remarkable cinematography, and the perfect balance of comedy and romance, is one of my favourite releases this year.  

References 

Baumbach, Noah. Marriage Story. Netflix, 2019. 

Fleming, Andrew. Emily in Paris. Netflix, 2020. 

Kahiu, Wanuri. Look Both Ways. Netflix, 2022. 

Parker, Ol. Ticket to Paradise. Universal Pictures, 2022. 

Meyers, Nancy. The Holiday. Universal Pictures, 2006. 

Marvel, Star Wars, and Jurassic Park: Do We Need Remakes and Sequels?

First Published via HUB Magazine when I was Culture Editor.

Date Published: 25th November 2022.

The latest possibility of remakes has been indulged by Doctor Strange: Multiverse of Madness where we are introduced to the similar face of Professor X (Patrick Stewart) and a different Reed Richards (John Krasinski) originally played by Ioan Gruffudd in the 2005’s Fantastic Four. The newest instalment of Fantastic Four will kick off Phase 6 in 2025, however, not starring John Krasinski. It really begs the question: do we really need more remakes? 

The perfect examples of why remakes and sequels do not always hit the mark are the Star Wars Sequels. I personally love the prequels more than the originals and I would classify Rogue One as a good example of recreating and continuing films for a new generation. The official sequels, however, seem to fall hard. How I see the Star Wars sequels is how I see the third Tobey Mcguire Spider-Man film. The third Spider-Man film is not THAT bad. However, if you watch the Spider-Man films in order, it looks terrible in comparison. The other Spider-Man films excel in acting, writing and fully developed characters. I believe this is the same for the sequels of Star Wars. I think the sequels by themselves are categorically good films. However, when you watch them as part of the entire franchise? It is bad. Personally, I will always say Revenge of the Sith is the best Star Wars film, however, Empire Strikes Back is one of the best films of all time. 

The Amazing Spider-Man is my all-time favourite Spider-Man film. I really think Andrew Garfield should be given another chance (and no that’s not just because he’s hot). I understand that the beginning story of Spider-Man is so well known that they did not bother with Tom Holland’s Spider-Man, but I love the origin story. Tom Holland brings a childhood innocence to the role that Tobey and Andrew lacked. Though Andrew Garfield is objectively the best actor of the three, I absolutely love his cocky, intelligent Spider-Man. The Amazing Spider-Man also presents my favourite love interest, Gwen Stacey played by Emma Stone. As a child I wanted to be Gwen so badly; she was smart, decisive and magnificent. The difference between Tobey/ Andrew’s Spider-Man and Tom’s is simple, theirs feels like a Spider-Man film while Tom’s feels like a Marvel film. I think Tom Holland is a good actor, who has plenty of room for growth. The third film clearly shows his increasing skill. However, Marvel seems to present Spider-Man as a side film for mainstream Marvel Characters and A-List actors whether that is Robert Downey Jr, Jake Gyllenhaal or Benedict Cumberbatch.  

I think X-Men present the perfect example of knowing when to stop. Unfortunately, each film gets worse and worse. Nonetheless, I go see it in the cinema each time. I am excited to see X-Men in the MCU, however, some actors are not replaceable. James McAvoy is one of my favourite actors to watch and it would be a waste of talent to not recast him for the MCU.   

On the one hand, Jurassic World are decent sequels. On the other hand, once you have watched the latest instalment where they mix the originals with the remakes it all makes sense of what was missing. I am not a big fan of Chris Pratt’s work; at his core, I truly believe he is a personality actor and not a character actor. By that, I mean he is cast to play himself and not cast based on his acting abilities to play a variety of characters. Jurassic World is a reminder that nothing can beat the Original. I would label Jurassic Park as my fifth favourite film ever. I do not think it is possible to recreate the wonder and magic of watching Jurassic Park for the first time.  

The question remains: should the film industry continue with remakes and sequels? The answer is simple. If you are trying to recreate the original like Jurassic World and Star Wars: The Force Awakens, then it will most likely fail. You need to add something to grip people into the film. They have already seen the original. If I wanted to watch a good film, I’d watch the original, not the bad remake. A different approach is a multiverse approach in Spider-Man: No Way Home and Jurassic World Dominion. It allows for all generations to watch a film and it creates a different plot line than the originals and you can build/develop characters.  

References-  

Abrams, J.J. Star Wars: The Force Awakens. Lucasfilm, 2015.  

Edwards, Gareth. Rogue One: A Star Wars Story. Lucasfilm, 2016.  

Kershner, Irvin. The Empire Strikes Back. Lucasfilm, 1980.  

Lucas, George. Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith. Lucasfilm, 2005.  

Raimi, Sam. Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness. Marvel Studios, 2022.  

Raimi, Sam. Spider-Man. Sony Pictures, 2002.  

Raimi, Sam. Spider-Man 2. Sony Pictures, 2004.  

Raimi, Sam. Spider-Man 3. Sony Pictures, 2007.  

Shakman, Matt. Fantastic Four. Marvel Studios, 2025.  

Spielberg, Steven. Jurassic Park. Universal Pictures, 1993.  

Story, Tim. Fantastic Four. Fox, 2005.  

Trevorrow, Colin. Jurassic World. Universal Pictures, 2015.  

Trevorrow, Colin. Jurassic World Dominion. Universal Pictures, 2022.  

Watts, Jon. Spider-Man: Homecoming. Columbia Pictures and Marvel Studios, 2017.  

Watts, Jon. Spider-Man: Far From Home. Columbia Pictures and Marvel Studios, 2019.  

Watts, Jon. Spider-Man: No Way Home. Columbia Pictures and Marvel Studios, 2021.  

Webb, Marc. The Amazing Spider-Man. Sony Pictures, 2012.  

Webb, Marc. The Amazing Spider-Man 2. Sony Pictures, 2014.  

Vaughn, Matthew. X-Men: First Class. 20th Century Studios, 2011.  

ResearcHER: Understanding Sexism in Research Careers and Inspiring the Next Generation.

First Published via HUB Magazine when I was Culture Editor.

Date Published: 18th November 2022.

The ResearcHER is a book inspiring the next generation of women to join research careers, written in collaboration with the Women in Academia Support Network (WIASN).

Founded in 2017, WISAN now has over 12,000 members in over 100 countries. It is a trans-inclusive and intersectional network for women who have lived through misogyny in their academic roles.

The authors of the book, Dr Kelly Pickard-Smith, Dr Amy Bonsall and Professor Elenora Belfiore, have overcome academic struggles to get to where they are today.

As Dr Kelly Pickard-Smith writes, ‘the book intends to not only inspire but also appreciate women’s contributions… developing new solutions, ways of thinking and being’. The book is easy to read, with short chapters offering an insightful view of researchers and exciting activities to do at home. The book also provides fun facts to offer a window into the lives of the researchers.

The book reveals the hardships of sexism in the research community, where ‘more than half of PhDs awarded are to women’ and yet ‘are woefully underrepresented in senior roles (2).

The book examines the research of diverse women as well. Fatima A. Junaid started a safe group for ‘Pakistani women in Academia’ and researched the wellbeing of Pakistani women. As is written, ‘We will hear difficult stories, but those voices need to be heard and known (11). Sarah Mohammad-Quereshi wants the reader to question our privilege in everyday life, as it is essential to understand how identity affects other people in professional careers (48).

While most of the researchers are heterosexual, Maria Maclennan identifies as bisexual. She aims to ‘leave the ladder down to help support other young women to take up more space in these areas in the future (22). Not only is it important for young queer women to have opportunities in these research fields, but it is equally important for them to have role models. As Melissa Anne Beattie (aromantic asexual) says ‘I’m at least able to show my students and my colleagues someone who managed to get to the front of the classroom while also being ‘different’ (41).

Jasmine Hazel Shadrack, who identifies as bisexual and is a late-diagnosed autistic, uses her research to focus on different ways to work through being a survivor of domestic abuse. As she notes, ‘that methodology has saved me, on more than one occasion (55).

Jennifer Leigh is the Vice Chair of the International Women in Supramolecular Chemistry (WISC) which launched in 2019. It aims to bring a ‘social science and equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) perspective to work with scientists to address marginalisation’ (59).

As Jessica Mannion notes, ‘it does not matter what you look like, if you have a disability or where you are from, you can still work in academia (67). I genuinely believe this book is inspiring to young women, especially neurodivergent women, as it shows that you can overcome the struggles and discrimination faced as a minority.

Taylor Swift has Masterminded us all with her New ‘Midnights (3 AM Edition)’ Album.

First Published via HUB Magazine when I was Culture Editor.

Date Published: 11th November 2022.

It has been an ongoing joke that Taylor Swift never sleeps as her music references midnight or two am. In typical Swift brilliance, she has turned that motif into an album concept. We join Taylor Swift at Midnight, only to be chaotically surprised with her 3 AM edition album.  

Swift and Jack Antonoff have worked together ever since ‘Out of the Woods’ in the ‘1989’ album. He worked alongside Aaron Dessner to produce Swift’s surprise albums ‘Folklore’ and ‘Evermore’. Antonoff is a force to be reckoned within the producer industry, winning the Producer of the Year Grammy last year. He produces your favourite pop artists including Lana Del Rey, Lorde, and his own band the Bleachers.  

‘Midnights’ can be recognised as a joint collaboration between Jack Antonoff and Taylor Swift. This is not to place doubt on Taylor Swift’s ability. She has proven herself time and time again. Ever since she made a change to Republic Records, she has been working with her best friends, including Dylan O’Brien who plays the drums on the album. 

While ‘Evermore’ is my all-time favourite album, ‘Midnights’ comes at a close second. It was a pleasant surprise to see 3 AM edition including Aaron Dessner who produced the majority of ‘Evermore’ and her soundtrack song ‘Carolina’.  

‘Midnights’ also introduces Zoe Kravitz as a writer on Swift’s album, who also works with Jack Antonoff in her band ‘LOLAWOLF’.  ‘Lavender Haze’ is Swift’s magically return to mainstream pop instead of her alternative pop albums of ‘Folklore’ and ‘Evermore’.  

‘Anti-hero’ was the first music video of ‘Midnights’, self-directed by Swift. The video has ‘Alice in Wonderland’ references in the teatime section. Swift has previously referenced ‘Alice in Wonderland’ in her ‘1989’ bonus track ‘Wonderland’. Perhaps used to signify that Swift feels left out of the music industry. Her other personas are split into the girl next door imagery that surrounded her image between her debut album till her ‘1989’ album and the other persona between ‘Reputation’ and ‘Evermore’. All these personas are both Swift and not Swift at the same time. In her ‘Miss Americana’ documentary, she notes that female musicians have to reinvent themselves more than male musicians and find new shiny parts of themselves the public admires. 

‘Anti-hero (feat. Bleachers)’ is the long-awaited collaboration between Antonoff’s band ‘Bleachers’ and Taylor Swift. It is extremely different from most of Swift’s music, however, I kind of love the combination. Vaguely feels like how the Wallows would perform ‘Anti-hero’. Personally, I would choose to listen to this version rather than the original. Unless you are a Jack Antonoff fan you may be unaware of his writing and vocal abilities. Though Antonoff has been with Swift since her album ‘1989’ we have yet to hear his voice in her music till now. 

If you know anything about Swift it is that Track five is always the most painful, soul-crushing, and heart-wrenching song. ‘You’re On Your Own, Kid’ does not disappoint, the bridge is as beautiful as it is hurtful. The line that hurts me deeply is ‘your dreams aren’t rare’, it reflects our childhood innocence and the almost painful nativity in believing that we can do anything we want till we grow up and realise there are too many people who want our dreams. This song has the same climax feel as ‘The Archer’, except it has a relief of climate with the lines ‘you’re on your own kid/ you always have been’.  

‘Bejeweled’ is the second music video from Swift’s ‘Midnights’, once again self-directed. It stars her best friends including the HAIM sisters who have collaborated with Swift on ‘No Body No Crime’ on ‘Evermore’ and ‘Gasoline’. One of the many easter eggs in the music video may be the similarity between Antonoff playing the prince in ‘Bejeweled’ and in the Bleachers ‘Don’t take the money’ music video. This was clearly a hint for the Bleachers collaboration with Swift on her song ‘Anti-hero’. ‘Bejeweled’ takes the Cinderella fairy story applying it to Swift’s life. Notably, this music video takes place after the ‘Willow’ music video. The golden string has transformed into sick, implying she has moved on from the invisible string that led her to the woods with ‘Folklore’ and ‘Evermore’. The music video also stars Oscar winner Laura Dern as the evil stepmother. Zoe Kravitz also appears in a portrait behind the Queen. If ‘Lavender Haze’ and ‘Midnight Rain’ weren’t obvious enough, Swift once again rejects a proposal from a man (seen previously in the two thousand and nineteen ‘ME! Feat Brendon Urie’). 

‘Karma’ shook the Swift community when the title track was announced. Swift is truly a Mastermind. The track title can be seen twice in ‘The Man’ music video which was Swift’s directorial debut. During her promotion for ‘Red (Taylor’s Version)’ she hinted at leaving easter eggs three years in advance on The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon. 

‘Glitch’ is one of the most satisfying songs on the album. It scratches part of my brain each time I hear it. Swift is known for her beautiful bridges throughout her musical career. However, this song contains the most sensual bridge of the entire album. It has the recognisable beat of Sam Dew, his only other co-written song on this album is ‘Lavender Haze’. Along with Swift and Antonoff, Sam Dew has made his mark on the pop music industry. I would argue both ‘Glitch’ and ‘Lavender Haze’ are the most likely to cause you to break into dance. 

‘Would’ve, Could’ve, Should’ve’ joins Swift’s collection of religious guilt songs. The painful bridge builds us up for one of Swift’s most rageful verses. It is almost as if you can hear the rage and pain infused in the lyrics and her voice: ‘Living for the thrill of hitting you where it hurts/ Give me back my girlhood/ It was mine first’. This lyric stands out as she extends ‘first’ to cut deeply. It reminds me of her high note in ‘Don’t Blame Me’ during the breakdown ‘using for the rest of my life’. It should be no surprise, co-written by Dessner and Swift, that this makes my top song of ‘Midnights (3 AM Edition)’.  

‘Dear Reader’ shares the same emotion as ‘Long Live’ from ‘Speak Now’. I can already see her on the piano, her last song of the evening on tour and remixing ‘Long Live’ and ‘Dear Reader’ together. Swift presents this song as the public figure of her is not real: ‘If you knew where I was walking/ To a house, not a home, all alone/ Cause nobody’s there’. This is one of Swift’s slowest songs on the album. It is beautifully enchanting and haunting.  

This album is full of pain, misery and angst covered up by pop sounds and beats which happens to be a Swift constant. Between ‘Forever Winter’ from ‘Red (Taylor’s version), almost the entire ‘Lover’ album and ‘Clean’ from the ‘1989’ album, Swift can create beautiful Pop songs with completely devasting lyrics. Swift has proven over and over that she is an incredible lyricist and poet, especially in ‘Folklore’ and ‘Evermore’. I do believe that ‘Midnights’ is one of Swift’s best albums, however, ‘Evermore’ remains my favourite. 

References- 

HAIM and Taylor Swift. Gasoline. Universal Music, 2021. 

Antonoff, Jack and Lorde. Don’t Take The Money. Sony Music, 2017. 

Swift, Taylor. 1989. Big Machine, 2014. 

Swift, Taylor. Carolina. Republic Records, 2022. 

Swift, Taylor. Evermore. Republic Records, 2020. 

Swift, Taylor. Folklore. Republic Records, 2020 

Swift, Taylor. Lover. Republic Records, 2019. 

Swift, Taylor. Midnights (3 AM Edition). Republic Records, 2022. 

Swift, Taylor. Red (Taylor’s Version). Republic Records, 2021. 

Swift, Taylor. Reputation. Big Machine, 2017.

Swift, Taylor. Speak Now. Big Machine, 2010. 

Wilson, Lana. Miss Americana. Tremolo Productions, 2020. 

Beauty and the Beast: Excelling in Theatre.

Photography by Skye Collacott Williamson.

First Published via HUB Magazine when I was Culture Editor.

Date Published: 28th October 2022.

Beauty and the Beast excels at all the dynamics and genres of theatre: comedic gold for the whole family, raw heart-wrenching emotions, and beautiful dancing.  

The costume design team has thoroughly outdone themselves with their production of Beauty and the Beast, I’m not even sure which outfit is my favourite. From the moment I saw Belle come onto the stage with her beautiful denim dress with little white flowers and that puffy long-sleeve shirt underneath, I knew the costumes would be beautiful; not only for the main characters but for the side characters even in dance sequences. A standout gown is Babette’s flapper-inspired pink dress matched with her pink hair. I cannot even express the amount of emotion I felt when Belle descended the stairs in her yellow dress, it quite possibly is the most beautiful dress I have ever seen. It brought me to tears.  

The stage is used to its full potential. In the forest scene, there are two screens used to create an intense atmosphere. A screen at the back creates the imagery of the forest and a see-through screen enhances the effects of the wolves hunting Belle’s father. During the performance of ‘Be Our Guest’, the use of the back screen shows a bird’s eye view of the stage’s floor as the dancers use the floor as part of a dance routine. It was very old school, combining both class and a sense of Las Vegas. The arch set design during ‘Be Our Guest’ was especially beautiful. There is a little hint of naughtiness from the entire cast as the dancers wear sparkling fishnets and have multiple layers of puffy material underneath their dresses.   

There is a moment in the theatre when you can truly feel the magic, as the atmosphere is emphasised by the music and set design. This beautiful moment was halfway through the play, when Belle reads the Beast ‘King Arthur’, finally promoting a sense of calm, familiarity and wonder. This is also helped by the set spinning around, possibly used to show the progression of time and/or the progression of their relationship. 

I was lucky enough to be sitting at the front, and was able to see the conductor instruct the orchestra. It is truly a sight to behold. I can’t even imagine how difficult it is and how much work is put into the orchestra for ‘Beauty and the Beast’.  

The level of excellence and precision required for the dance sequence during both ‘Gaston’ and ‘Be Our Guest’ is beyond incredible. Every single dancer was choreographed to the second. My favourite was during ‘Gaston’ when they use the beer mugs to create an action sequence and a dance. Perfectly timed with the instruments, it overflows with excitement, bringing a whole another level of life. ‘Be Our Guest’ reminds me of the Great Gatsby era as well as the scene in Captain America the First Avenger where Steve is dancing to cheer up the soldiers. It is flirty, fun, and adventurous. 

Courtney Stapleton who plays Belle gives the performance of a lifetime, especially during her solo when she decides to trade herself for her father. I was completely hypothesised by her performance. If there is something actors in theatres must have to engage audiences for a long period of time and to connect them to the production, she has it completely. 

Louis Stockil playing Le Fou is beyond comedic excellence, with every movement of his bringing another laughter to the audience. His comedic timing is beyond perfection, and he has a bigger-than-life stage presence than even Gaston. Though this should not discredit Tom Senior’s performance as Gaston, he especially delivers during his duo with Belle, arguing over the proposal. He truly acts the part of Gaston with his charm, wit and hyper-masculinity. 

All the cast have stand-out voices. The dynamic between Alyn Hawke playing Lumiere and Emma Caffrey playing Babette gives ease and lightness to the theatre. One question I want to have answered, is how Sam Baliey playing Mrs Potts has her hand up for so long. Baliey gave an extreme sense of realism to the theatre; she reminded the audience of the pain the Beast and the rest of the castle’s servants are in. Her companion, Samantha Bingley playing Madame, made the audience laugh.  

When Belle enters the west wing where she is forbidden to go, Shaq Taylor brings such raw emotion to his solo as the Beast. I felt a heartbreak that almost drove me to the point of tears. Taylor plays such a complex character with a combination of sweetness, comedy and menacing. He plays the Beast’s fine line between kind and danger perfectly. It is truly an accomplishment to his acting abilities to both draw compassion and hatred from an audience.   

Beauty and the Beast is playing at the Hippodrome Theatre in Bristol till 12 November 2022.